3 Components of the Angry Online Commenter

disinhibition

Popular Science recently made the decision to do away with comments on their website. The editors have repeatedly made the argument that allowing online comments on their articles “undermines the integrity of science” and creates an environment of “aggression and mockery”. The article, which focused on the psychology of online comments, led me to the Online Disinhibition Effect – ODE.

The theory behind ODE, which was published in 2004 when the Internet was just starting to take over the world, stems from a belief that our online actions cannot be associated with our real world identities; we can say and do things under the blanket of anonymity, which means we may tell the world our secrets (benign disinhibition) or chastise others for revealing theirs (toxic disinhibition).

WHY DISINHIBITION?

1. Because You Don’t Know Me (Dissociative Anonymity)

The Internet allows us to wander throughout multiple environments without a name or a face attached to our identities. This anonymity lessens stigmas (perceived or otherwise) on behavior, with then drops inhibitions. We can act out our hostile feelings without having to take responsibility for them. We can also disassociate ourselves from our actions, thereby convincing ourselves that our online behavior is completely separate from who we are in the “real world”.

2. Because You Can’t See Me (Invisibility)

Anonymity and invisibility are, in many ways, dependent upon each other but they are also very different from each other. Invisibility extends to chats, texts, and email communications because while the recipient knows who you are, they can’t see your expression while you’re typing.

Without an identity, we have the courage to do and say the things we never would if there was someone watching our every move, someone capable of showing disapproval or disappointment.

3. Because We’re Equals (Minimize Authority)

Because the Internet is faceless, everyone begins on the same level. Everyone is equal in their anonymity and invisibility. This makes conversations with authority figures easier in the minds of those who would not otherwise have the courage to speak their minds. The Internet is, in this respect, the great equalizer – we’re all peers within the Web, no matter our job titles or personal achievements.

HOW DO WE USE IT TO OUR ADVANTAGE?

The power of anonymity, invisibility, and minimized authority makes the Internet a breeding ground for negative feedback.  Consumers have a way to express their dislike of or discontent with businesses in a very public, very anonymous way.

Dr. David Solly at University of the Rockies in Colorado conducted a 2011 study on the online disinhibition of consumers and responses to businesses through social media. He discovered that there’s a small loophole in the relationship between angry customers and the companies they dislike. That loophole is engagement.

You heard me – engagement. By authenticating an unhappy customer’s need for power and control in this one scenario, your business validate’s that customer’s concerns while also establishing a connection. Dr. Solly says, “Showing customers that the business cares about them, regardless of whether it’s acknowledgement of a complaint or a compliment, provides a sense of belonging and builds loyalty.”

This isn’t to say that occasionally, an Internet Troll is just, in fact, a Troll. Not all angry commenters can be reasoned with, but there should always be the opportunity for a dialogue.

Comments
  • I think these three points are valid for most people. Many people hide behind social media. However, I do think there are some, like myself, who are able to say to someone what they put online. I think we must first define “mean” comments before we continue the discussion. One might feel being called out on social media or through an article about “mean” comments is mean. I think it’s very subjective. Somethings may be universally accepted as mean but most often it’s not a person’s intent to be mean. I think there are several factors that need to be considered of which intent, style, and personality are primary. One person may consider something mean bc it is worded in a way they would not have stated it. Others may feel it is appropriate because they share a common experience with the writer. As I said, most times, what is considered mean is very subjective.

  • I think you’re spot on. There will always be people who make offensive statements, or make disagreeable statements (depending on the reader’s point of view), but such is life.

    I also agree with Larry. “Mean” is definitely subjective. An honest comment could be construed as mean/hostile/angry, if it’s contrary a person’s beliefs/own truth. I also think people often sensor their honest opinions in face-to-face interactions for fear of hurting feelings, being judged harshly for what they say, or perhaps out of shyness. Therefore, anonymity of commenting online allows people to voice their honest opinion on things they may otherwise have feared backlash over if they had said them in person. It also allows folks to be engaged in conversations they may not have had the opportunity to participate in otherwise. Additionally, tone isn’t always easily conveyed via text. Comments can be misconstrued as “mean” if the writer intended them to be sarcastic, or if they wrote in all CAPS.

    Anyway, I’ve wandered from the point… With the Internet being public, I think we just have to take the good with the bad and the ugly. Silencing readers from commenting is like telling them their opinion doesn’t matter; it doesn’t necessarily foster a community of communication and collaboration.

    Nicely written, Meg!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

About ADG

ADG Creative is a strategic communications firm specializing in branding, interactive, learning and gaming, and software development. We combine process, experience and extraordinary creative talent to tell our customers' stories in unique, memorable and usually unexpected ways, leveraging both conventional and new media platforms.